Comparing EASM and Pen Testing: Scope, Objectives, Capabilities

External Attack Surface Management and Penetration Testing both enhance an organization's cybersecurity posture, but in different ways. This e-Book compares EASM and Pen Testing by exploring each methodology's scope, objectives, and capabilities.

Get the e-book now

By submitting this form, and providing us with your personal information therein, you agree to the storing and processing of such personal data by Detectify as described in the privacy policy. Detectify uses the information you provide to us to contact you about our relevant content, products, and services. You can withdraw your consent at any time.

What's inside:

  • An introduction to the External Attack Surface Management (EASM) and Penetration Testing (Pen Testing) methodologies
  • The scope, objectives, and use cases for EASM and Pen Testing
  • A digestible table overview of how EASM and Pen Testing capabilities compare
  • Deep dive into each methodologies capabilities
  • Advice on combining Pen Testing with EASM
  • 10 key takeaways when considering the implementation of EASM and Pen Testing

Get a deeper understanding of how External Attack Surface Management and Pen Testing compare in critical capabilities such as frequency & timing, attack surface visibility, asset scoping, asset discovery, reporting & remediation, false positives, and types of testing.